Continuously expandable interbody spacer in (A) minimized and (B)

Download scientific diagram | Continuously expandable interbody spacer in (A) minimized and (B) expanded forms (RISE-L Globus Medical, Inc, Audubon, PA). from publication: Comparative Effectiveness of Expandable Versus Static Interbody Spacers via MIS LLIF: A 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Study | Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objective The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of expandable interbody spacers to static interbody spacers. Methods This is a retrospective, institutional review board–exempt chart review of | Static, Mullerian Inhibiting Substance (MIS) and Outcome Assessment (Health Care) | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.

In Vitro Biomechanical and Fluoroscopic Study of a Continuously Expandable Interbody Spacer Concerning Its Role in Insertion Force and Segmental Kinematics

Comparative Effectiveness of Adjustable Lordotic Expandable versus Static Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices: One Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

Modèle Caring-PPH appliqué en soins de réadaptation © (St-Germain

Comparative Effectiveness of Laterally Placed Expandable versus Static Interbody Spacers: A 1-Year Follow-Up Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Study

Comparison of actual, predicted, and optimal range of motion (ROM) in

ProLift® Interbody Spacer System, Spine Products

James Towner's research works University of Rochester, Rochester (UR) and other places

Expandable transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage surgical stages.

Yan Michael LI, MD PhD, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas, MD Anderson