Thinx, Inc. to Settle PFAS/PFOA Lawsuit

In late January, Thinx, Inc. announced that it had reached a $5 million settlement agreement to end Dickens v. Thinx, Inc., a class action perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS/PFOA) lawsuit. Thinx will provide up to $5 million to reimburse consumers who bought the company’s signature period underwear between November 12, 2016 and November 28, 2022. To put this in perspective, reimbursements are limited to $7.00 per pair (up to 3 pairs) for consumers who still have receipts and $3.50 per pair (same limit) for those who do not. The initial purchase price of these undies runs up to $35.00 per pair.

PFAS Class-Action Thinx Period Underwear Lawsuit Settled for $5 Million

PFAS in period underwear: The Thinx scandal – Mme L'Ovary

The 10 Best Non Toxic Period Underwear - PFAS Free! - Pure and Simple Nourishment

Australian period underwear makers deny using 'forever chemicals' after Thinx settles suit in US, PFAS

STEEP researcher served as expert witness in settled Minnesota v. 3M lawsuit – STEEP

CQ Researcher - Forever Chemicals

Thinx underwear PFAS lawsuit survives bid to dismiss

What the Thinx Class Action Settlement Means for All of Us

Thinx 'non-toxic' period panties settles $5M lawsuit over harmful chemicals

For states, the work on 'forever chemicals' has just begun, and potential economic effects on agriculture loom large - CSG Midwest - CSG Midwest

Thinx Settled a Lawsuit Claiming Its Period Underwear Contains Potentially Harmful Chemicals

Thinx To Pay Up To $5 Million To Settle Class Action Suit

Are period undies safe?: Thinx class-action lawsuit, PFAs

Toxic chemicals in period underwear? What to know as U.S.-based Thinx settles lawsuit - National

PFAS and Period Products: A Ruby Cup Update