Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access

This study compared outcomes of 874 patients who received either two ProGlide devices or one ProGlide plus one FemoSeal for vascular closure after transfemoral TAVI, finding reduced complications with the combination approach.

Terumo Femoseal

Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials on the Safety of Vascular Closure Devices for Femoral Arterial Puncture Site Haemostasis

Apple iPhone SE (2020), 64 GB - Բջջային հեռախոսներ

/cms/10.2217/fca-2020-0065/a

Frontiers A 20-year journey in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Evolution to current eminence

PDF) Long-Term Evolution of Percutaneous Groin Access in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: A Study of the Sequential Suture and Plug Vascular Closure Devices Technique

Built Upon the Perclose™ Legacy

Propensity-matched comparison of vascular closure devices after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using MANTA versus ProGlide

SOLACI Latin American Society of Interventional Cardiology

Frontiers A 20-year journey in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Evolution to current eminence

PDF) Long-Term Evolution of Percutaneous Groin Access in Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: A Study of the Sequential Suture and Plug Vascular Closure Devices Technique

PDF) A Stopped Pilot Study of the ProGlide Closure Device After Transbrachial Endovascular Interventions

Alberto P. on LinkedIn: Dual ProGlide versus ProGlide and FemoSeal for vascular access haemostasis…

Davide Capodanno on LinkedIn: In this study, vascular closure after TAVI using a combined suture- and…